General Terms

• Reviewers must adhere to the ethical and professional standards required for evaluating student projects in an official national competition.
• Evaluation must be conducted transparently, impartially, and objectively to ensure the integrity of the judging process.
• Reviewers are required to maintain the confidentiality of project details, evaluations, and discussions throughout the competition period.
• In case of any conflict of interest, it must be disclosed before the review process begins.

Intellectual Property Rights and Confidentiality

• Reviewers are not entitled to claim any intellectual property rights for the submitted projects.
• Sharing, copying, or using any content, ideas, or materials submitted for the competition for purposes outside the judging process is strictly prohibited.
• Reviewers must not discuss or disclose any details related to the projects before the official announcement of the results.

Review Process and Evaluation Criteria

• Projects will be evaluated based on pre-approved criteria to ensure objectivity and fairness.
• Key factors in the evaluation include scientific value, innovation, feasibility, and real-world impact.
• Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback to help participants improve their projects.

Commitment and Professionalism

• Reviewers must complete their evaluations within the specified timeframe to maintain the competition schedule.
• The competition is an official event organized by a national entity, requiring reviewers to uphold the credibility and prestige of the evaluation process.
• Any bias, favoritism, or unprofessional behavior will result in exclusion from future reviewing roles.